Legal Opinion

Miners & Merchants Savings Bank v. Comer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1966No. File 10253PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Commissioner.

By its complaint the plaintiff Bank prays for judgment on a promissory note executed by Comer, and a written contract executed by Reinhard Brothers Company which in terms guarantees payment of the Comer note. The defendant, Reinhard Brothers Company, pleaded facts which it asserted discharged it from liability under our statutes. The trial court held Reinhard Brothers Company to have been discharged. The appeal is by the Bank.

Our convenience will best be served by developing the material facts in the course of our discussion, and by referring to the parties as the Bank,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. White v. . RintoulNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Northern State Bank v. BellamyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bailey Loan Co. v. SewardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Burt v. GageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Richter v. Industrial Finance Co. Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. International Multifoods Corp. v. MardianSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Massey Ferguson Credit Corp. v. BiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Western Petroleum Co. v. First Bank Aberdeen (N.A.)South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. International Multifoods Corp. v. MardianSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API