Buckley v. Valeo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Chief Judge, filed a separate opinion dissenting from Part V — A—2 of the per curiam opinion.
TAMM, Circuit Judge, joined by WIL-KEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the per curiam opinion, and concurring in the result only of Part V.
MacKINNON, Circuit Judge, filed a separate opinion dissenting from Part VII of the per curiam opinion.
Summary
This case presents for review the latest, and by far the most comprehensive, reform legislation passed by Congress concerning the election of the President, Vice-President and members of Congress. The plaintiffs have asked this court to enter a…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited78 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PACSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Randall v. SorrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.