Legal Opinion
Gibson v. Bellingham & N. Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 20, 1914No. 2708PublishedCited by 5 opinions
At Law. Action by William Gibson against the Bellingham & Northern Railway Company. On motion to remand to state court.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought action against the defendant in the superior court of Washington for personal injuries sustained under the Employers’ Liability Act. Thereafter, on motion of the defendant, the action was removed to this court. A motion has been made to remand the cause.
*489Section 28, Judicial Code, provides:
“That no case arising under an act entitled ‘An act relating to the liability of common carriers by railroad to their employes in certain cases,’ approved April twenty-second, nineteen hundred and eight, or any amendment thereto, and brought in any state court of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Goetz v. Interlake S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kelly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928