Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kelly's Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

RespoNSe to Petition for Rehearing by

Judge Carroll

— Overruling.

Counsel for appellant, in a petition for a rehearing, present for the first time the argument that the judgment below should be reversed because the Montgomery Circuit Court had no jurisdiction to entertain or determine the action.

The Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides: “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved; and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Johnson's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KornhoffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Holloway's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API