Legal Opinion
Flanders v. Lyon & Healy
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1897No. 7175PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error from the district court of Douglas Tried below before Blair, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
Lyon & Healy, a corporation, brought this action in replevin before a justice of the peace for a piano, piano stool and cover, claiming the same under a chattel mortgage. The plaintiff gave bond and the property was delivered to it under the writ. Subsequently a motion was filed by Lyon & Healy for leave to substitute P. J. Healy as plaintiff, “for the reason that the note and mortgage on which this action is based have been assigned to said P. J.. Healy, who now owns the same.” A motion was also filed by P. J. Healy asking on his part that he be made plaintiff instead of Lyon &…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davis v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Leaird v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Hubler v. PullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Dubbers v. GouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Omaha Furniture & Carpet Co. v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Burlington Voluntary Relief Department v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Meyer v. Omaha Furniture & Carpet Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Nebraska v. HaydenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1898
- Shoaff v. GageDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1958