Scott v. Furrow
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiffs brought a habeas corpus action to secure the custody of two minor chil dren. The Superior Court rendered judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiffs have appealed.
The facts found by the court may be stated, in summary, as follows: The plaintiff Kenneth H. Scott, of Lincoln, Maine, and the defendant, Tressa W. (Scott) Furrow, of Southington, Connecticut, are the parents of two minor children, Kenneth, twelve years old, and Beth Ellen, about ten. The plaintiff Pearl Scott, also of Lincoln, is the paternal grandfather. The plaintiff Kenneth and the defendant had married in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kelsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Krasnow v. KrasnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Bailey v. MarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Corrie v. CorrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Adamsen v. AdamsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Howarth v. NorthcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Presutti v. PresuttiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Vitale v. GargiuloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Antedomenico v. AntedomenicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.