Priddy v. Dodd
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
Priddy brought replevin against Dodd for a horse. Plea, property in the defendant. Replication, that the property was not, at, &c., the property of the defendant, but of the plaintiff, &c., concluding to the country. On this issue the cause was submitted to a jury. Verdict and judgment for the defendant.
A motion for a new trial made at the proper time was overruled. The evidence is all set out in a bill of exceptions.
The plaintiff rested his motion for a new trial solely on his own affidavit, setting out for cause, &c., that he was taken by surprise by the evidence of one of the defendant’s…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mann v. CliftonIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Baldwin v. BurrowsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Cromer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Conrad v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Ogden v. KelseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.