Legal Opinion

Priddy v. Dodd

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1853PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Priddy brought replevin against Dodd for a horse. Plea, property in the defendant. Replication, that the property was not, at, &c., the property of the defendant, but of the plaintiff, &c., concluding to the country. On this issue the cause was submitted to a jury. Verdict and judgment for the defendant.

A motion for a new trial made at the proper time was overruled. The evidence is all set out in a bill of exceptions.

The plaintiff rested his motion for a new trial solely on his own affidavit, setting out for cause, &c., that he was taken by surprise by the evidence of one of the defendant’s…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mann v. CliftonIndiana Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Baldwin v. BurrowsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Cromer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Conrad v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Ogden v. KelseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API