Legal Opinion

Ogden v. Kelsey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1892No. 305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.

The appellant’s complaint is in three paragraphs, to recover for plumbing done on real estate be-, longing to the appellee.

The first paragraph is on account, for woi’k done and materials furnished at the request of the appellee, as set out in a bill of particulars. The second paragraph is for the work and materials named in said bill of particulars, it being further alleged that the appellee was the owner of certain real estate in the city of Fort Wayne, and that for the betterment of said real estate she employed the *301appellant to do the work and furnish the materials aforesaid. The third…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Neeley v. SearightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Lehman v. HawksIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sohn v. JervisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Brenner v. QuickIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Ford v. FordIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. HueyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Continental National Bank v. Discount & Deposit State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. First National Bank v. MulfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Camblin v. MetzgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Taggart v. KemIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API