Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Burrows

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1884No. 10,918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellants brought an action of replevin against appellee for an organ alleged to be worth f 60.

Appellee answered in three paragraphs, first, a denial; sec- , ond, purchase and payment; third, set-off. A demurrer was sustained to the third and overruled to the second paragraph. A reply in denial was filed to the second.. And there was a trial by jury, verdict for the defendant, and, over motions for a venire de novo and for a new trial, judgment was rendered for the defendant.

The plaintiffs have appealed to this court and assigned as error:

1st. Overruling demurrer to second…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crocker v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Cory v. SilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Noble v. EpperlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Priddy v. DoddIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Ward v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Jackson v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cromer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Conrad v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API