Legal Opinion

Aero Sales Co. v. Columbia Steel Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 24, 1954No. 29419PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, engaged in the steel warehousing and fabricating business in Dallas and Houston, Texas, commenced the present treble damage action against defendants under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, alleging violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1.

Since the action was commenced in California plaintiffs look to the three-year statute of limitations, Code Civ. Proc. § 338 (1), for establishing the period for which they may recover damages. The section in question requires an action to be brought within three years…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Electric Theater Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
  2. Rose v. First St. Bk. of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Ben C. Jones & Co. v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  4. Hollingsworth v. Cities Service Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Clark v. Jacksonville Compress Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barbara B. Sack v. V. T. Low, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name of Bear, Stearns & Co., and Richard W. SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Holland v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Alva Studios, Inc. v. WinningerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. Earl W. Green v. H. L. Wilkinson and U.S. Chewing Gum Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API