Legal Opinion
In re Prime
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 6, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The order appealed from inter alia provided for dismissal of objections to the accoun t and the judicial settlement of the same as filed. The facts are not in dispute; The sole question involved is one of law, namely, whether sections 72 to 76 of the Banking Law bar the filing and litigation of said objections.
On March 1, 1909, Susie E. Heermance executed a trust deed, under which upon her death the trust property went to Jessie Heermance Prime, as trustee, dining the lives of the individual appellants. About January, 1917, the Westchester Trust Company succeeded her as such trustee and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of International M. Co. (Broderick)New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Chester v. . JumelNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Consolidated Electric Storage Co. v. Atlantic Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- In re LempAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rieseberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1963
- Buck v. Westchester Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Liquidation of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Chapman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2002
- In re the Liquidation of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937