Legal Opinion

United States v. ANACONDA AMERICAN BRASS COMPANY

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 20, 1962No. Cr. 10725PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

The Bridgeport Brass Company, a Connecticut Corporation (hereafter Bridgeport), one of eleven corporate and seven individual defendants charged with having engaged in an unlawful combination and conspiracy beginning at least in 1956 and continuing at least until sometime in-1961 in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act by an indictment returned on September 12, 1962, moves to dismiss the indictment against it upon the ground that its corporate existence ceased on June 14, 1961 when its merger with National Distillers & Chemical Corporation, a Virginia corporation…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re City of BridgeportUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
  2. United States v. Michael Santo Polizzi, United States of America v. Jack S. Shapiro, United States of America v. Peter James Bellanca, United States of America v. Anthony Giardano, United States of America v. Arthur J. Rooks, United States of America v. Anthony Joseph Zerilli, United States of America v. Emprise Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Arcos Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
  4. United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API