Legal Opinion
United States v. Arcos Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 22, 1964No. Cr. 64-200PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, District Judge.
On May 11, 1964 an indictment was returned in this court against four defendants, charging a conspiracy under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1.
Defendant Alloy Rods Company has moved for a dismissal of the indictment as to it, Rule 12, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The basis of the said motion is that Alloy Rods has been dissolved as a corporation, and consequently no longer “exists” for purposes of criminal prosecution.1
There is no dispute as to the facts herein. Alloy Rods was incorporated under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania in 1946. In 1961 Alloy Rods…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. NisleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Melrose Distillers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Michael Santo Polizzi, United States of America v. Jack S. Shapiro, United States of America v. Peter James Bellanca, United States of America v. Anthony Giardano, United States of America v. Arthur J. Rooks, United States of America v. Anthony Joseph Zerilli, United States of America v. Emprise Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Shields Rubber Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974