Peterson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WHITHAM, Justice.
The appellee, Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., brought this action to recover a deficit in a futures trading account of its customer, the appellant, Roy S. Peterson. The trial court: (1) directed a verdict for Dean Witter on its case-in-chief; (2) directed a verdict against Peterson on certain of his cross-claims and affirmative defenses; and (3) submitted Peterson’s remaining cross- claims to the jury. Of those submitted to the jury, the jury found in Peterson’s favor only on a breach of fiduciary duty issue. The jury, however, found no proximate cause for damages.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. JinkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Texas Gas Utilities Company v. BarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lesikar v. Rappeport, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Burnside Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc. v. T.S. Young Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
- El Dorado Motors, Inc. v. Koch, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Whitehead v. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.