Legal Opinion

Stover v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1942No. 21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Associate Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the Municipal Court of a violation of Section 39 of the Act of October 9, 1940, Public No. 824, 76th Congress, c. 790, sube. 2, 54 Stat. 1080, D.C.Code 1940, § 35 — 1342, which prohibited the conduct of insurance business by an unauthorized company; and, likewise, prohibited any person from directly or indirectly negotiating for, or soliciting applications for policies of, or for membership in, any company which is not authorized to do business in the District. The company for which it was charged appellant solicited such insurance was the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. United States v. WinslowSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. EllenwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Hillman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TibbettsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Harrison v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Ishkanian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API