Central Holding Co. v. Bushman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Two causes in equity were consolidated and heard together. The first challenges three mortgages as usurious and seeks appropriate relief. Plaintiffs Harold R. Finn and his wife, Geraldine Finn, were the mortgagors. After the indebtedness had been determined and properly evidenced and the mortgages given to secure the same, and after they had been recorded, the Finns conveyed the premises by warranty deed to Central Holding Company, a Michigan corporation. The consideration recited in the deed is one dollar and other valuable considerations. The deed excepts “mortgages of record,” but it does…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merchants Exchange National Bank v. Commercial Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Union National Bank v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. KimmelMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
- Barney v. Tontine Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Sellers v. BotsfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pergament v. FrazerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1949
- Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- PNC Bank, National Ass'n v. Goyette Mechanical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- King v. EmmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Tuxedo Enterprises, Inc. v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.