Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Spiegelman

Kensington Village Court

Decided January 24, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stephen R. Taub, J.

Defendant moves, pursuant to CPL 170.35 (1) (a), for dismissal of a simplified trafile information on the grounds that said information is insufficient as a matter of law for failure to provide a supporting deposition pursuant to timely demand. The affirmation in support of the motion refers the court to no relevant cases, relying entirely on the language of CPL 100.25 (2).

The Village Prosecutor has cross-moved to amend the simplified traffic information (presumably by serving the supporting deposition) or alternatively for leave to re-serve the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BaronAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
  2. People v. De FeoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
  3. People v. MonroeNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. SchlosserNassau County District Court · 1985
  5. People v. HartmannWhite Plains City Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. AucelloAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990
  2. People v. RossiJustice Court of Village of Muttontown · 1992
  3. People v. ErdmanValley Stream Justice Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API