Legal Opinion

City of Wyandotte, a Michigan Municipal Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Also Known as Conrail, Also Known as Conrail, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2001No. 00-1151PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

262 F.3d 581 (6th Cir. 2001)

City of Wyandotte, a Michigan municipal corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Consolidated Rail Corporation, also known as Conrail, also known as Conrail, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-1151

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Argued: May 1, 2001

Decided and Filed: August 24, 2001

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit, No. 97-71237, John Corbett O'Meara, District Judge.[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

William R. Look, LOOK, MAKOWSKI & LOOK, Wyandotte, Michigan, for Appellee.

Gr…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hazel M. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SODEXHO, CUMBERLAND COLLEGE CAFETERIA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Tolbert v. Ohio Dept. Of Trans.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United National Insurance Company v. Sst Fitness CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Comerica Bank v. Lexington Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. GranholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe Of Chippewa Indians v. Jennifer GranholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. GranholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API