Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Quattrocchi

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 27, 2010No. 7:08-cv-09514PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:

Defendants Lisa Quattroechi (“Quattroechi”), Amy Aronson (“Aronson”), Clifford Aronson, George Siegel, and Albert Flieschman (“Flieschman”) removed the present action, Marcus v. Quattrocchi, No. 23723/08 (Sup.Ct.2008), from state court. Plaintiffs Katheryn Marcus (“Marcus”) and Sarah Goldberg (“Goldberg”) move to remand this case back to state court. Specifically, Plaintiffs maintain that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because their claims fall within the probate exception to federal jurisdiction, and because the amount in…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bar Group, LLC v. Business Intelligence Advisors, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  2. United States v. BlakeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. Sovereign Bank, N.A. v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. Oliver v. HinesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
  5. Nanomedicon, LLC v. Research Foundation of the State UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API