Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wambaugh

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1998No. 1:CV-94-1470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

McCLURE, District Judge.

BACKGROUND:

On September 14, 1994, plaintiff Jay C. Smith, D.Ed., commenced this action with the filing of a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendant Joseph P. Wambaugh conspired with police and prosecutors to deprive Smith of his rights under the Fourth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments (Count I). The complaint also sets forth claims under state law for conspiracy (Count II) and abuse of process (Count III). The object of the conspiracy under Count II was the abuse of process alleged under Count III. Counts II and III were dismissed by the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. HoltzDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. LE SCHACK v. DEVEREUXDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Samuel B. Randolph, IV v. John Wetzel, et al.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API