Smith v. Holtz
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
McCLURE, District Judge.
BACKGROUND:
This unique case is before the court on post-trial motions following the return of a verdict in favor of two former troopers of the Pennsylvania State Police and an attorney for the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General. The issues presented involve primarily whether certain evidence was material and exculpatory within the meaning of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), whether this court erred with respect to certain evidentiary rulings and whether the jury verdict was unreasonable in light of the evidence…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jay C. Smith v. John J. Holtz, Bureau of Technical Services, Pennsylvania State Police Ronald F. Coyler, Bureau of Technical Services, Pennsylvania State Police Victor Dove John J. Purcell, Special Agent in Charge, Central Regional Office, Bureau of Criminal Investigations, Office of the Attorney General William J. Lander, Bureau of Criminal Investigations, Office of the Attorney General Paul YatronCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Smith v. HoltzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Padilla v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999