Legal Opinion

Sleyster v. Eugene Donzelot & Son

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 13, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The controversy herein arose under the provisions of the Act of 1925 (Laws 1925, p. 375) known as the Workmen's Compensation Law. The respondent here is the widow, and was the sole dependent of her husband, William G. Sleyster, who died on the 25th day of January, 1927, as the result of accidental injuries sustained while in the course of his employment at the place of his employers, appellants, Eugene Douzolet and Son, in the city of St. Louis. At the time of his death and for more than a year prior thereto, the deceased has been an employee of appellants at a weekly wage of $57.69 per week,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vanderberg v. Kansas City, Missouri, Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Springfield Southwestern Railway Co. v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Vandeventer v. Florida Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Kerr v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. State ex rel. Lingenfelder v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Ashbrook v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. Burgstrand v. Crowe Coal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Brandon v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Sleyster v. Eugene Donzelot & SonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API