Legal Opinion

Ashbrook v. Willis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 4, 1936PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action on plaintiff's petition and defendant's counterclaim for damages arising out of a collision between automobiles owned by plaintiff and defendant. The jury returned a $500 verdict for plaintiff and a $500 verdict for defendant. The trial court, upon motion, granted plaintiff a new trial for error in giving defendant's Instruction No. 5, submitting defendant's counterclaim on the "humanitarian" or "last chance" doctrine.

[1] Defendant assigns error in the sustaining of said motion on the ground said instruction was proper and maintains he is entitled to the reinstatement of his judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Vanderberg v. Kansas City, Missouri, Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Little River Drainage District v. HouckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Village of Grandview v. McElroySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Kingshighway Presbyterian Church v. Sun Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. SteckloffSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Rossomanno v. Laclede Cab CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Simmons v. FridaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Ewing v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Heuer v. UlmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API