Scoland v. Scoland
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J. —
In this case the action for divorce is based upon alleged acts of cruelty, and it was entirely proper *119that other acts of cruelty occurring subsequently to the commencement of the action should be alleged by supplemental complaint. Whether they should be allowed to be shown at so late a stage of the proceedings was for the superior court in its discretion to say. No harm seems to have come of it.
A motion for a non-suit was made at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, which was denied. Technically a motion for a non-suit is not applicable to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cattell v. FergussonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-Operative Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Schwab v. SchwabCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Lilly v. EklundWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Kane v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Maley v. MaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.