Legal Opinion

Scoland v. Scoland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1892No. 377PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

In this case the action for divorce is based upon alleged acts of cruelty, and it was entirely proper *119that other acts of cruelty occurring subsequently to the commencement of the action should be alleged by supplemental complaint. Whether they should be allowed to be shown at so late a stage of the proceedings was for the superior court in its discretion to say. No harm seems to have come of it.

A motion for a non-suit was made at the close of plaintiff’s testimony, which was denied. Technically a motion for a non-suit is not applicable to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cattell v. FergussonWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. West Pub. Co. v. Lawyers' Co-Operative Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  2. Schwab v. SchwabCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  3. Lilly v. EklundWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Kane v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Maley v. MaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API