Legal Opinion

Cattell v. Fergusson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1892No. 280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The respondents entered into a written contract with one John C. Fergusson to erect a building upon certain real estate which the pleadings admit belonged to the appellant. Said John C. Fergusson and the appellant *542were husband and wife, and the respondents claim that he was also her agent, and acting for her in the premises. The appellant claims there was no proof of such agency. The evidence shows that the contract was entered into September 21, 1889. Prior thereto, on the 12th of said month, the appellant and her said husband obtained…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lilly v. EklundWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Scoland v. ScolandWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Kane v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Michel v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API