Legal Opinion

Kane v. Kane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1904No. 5142PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Douglas county, Neal, J., entered October 21, 1903, upon findings in favor of the defendant, granting a divorce upon a cross-complaint, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This is an action for divorce, involving also the adjustment of property interests. On or about the 1st day of October, 1901, Patrick Kane and Elizabeth Kane became husband and wife. Thereafter, on March 31, 1902, the wife filed a complaint in the superior court of Douglas county, asking for a divorce from the husband. That action not having been brought on for trial, the husband thereafter, on the 15th day of November, 1902, filed a complaint in the same court asking for divorce from *519the wife. The wife then filed an answer and cross-complaint to the husband’s complaint, demanding a divorce,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Enos v. WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cadwell v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Scoland v. ScolandWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Nickeus v. Lewis CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Kirby v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CarothersWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Prentice Packing & Storage Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. v. TalleyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McCallum v. McCallumWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Smith v. AlfordUtah Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API