Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Force MacHinery Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 10, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
123 N.J. Super. 497 (1973)
303 A.2d 619
ROSE MARSHALL AND RICHARD MARSHALL, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
FORCE MACHINERY CO., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, RUTH FORCE, EDYTH MARGOLIS AND EDWARD MARGOLIS, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided April 10, 1973.
Messrs. Slavitt, Slavitt & Fish, attorneys for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Conant and McCreedy, attorneys for defendants Force Machinery and Ruth Force.
Messrs. Sach and Sachs, attorneys for defendants Margolis.
BRESLIN, R.W., J.C.C., Temporarily Assigned.
This action evolves from a collision between two automobiles that occurred on January 29, 1969…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Farren v. NJ Turnpike AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Harvey v. CrawNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Tischler v. SteinholtzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Konitch v. HartungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Moosebrugger v. Prospect Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cremen v. Harrah's Marina Hotel CasinoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Cameron v. G & H Steel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Stephenson v. RA Jones & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Stephenson v. RA Jones & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986