People v. Costa
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Appellants David Costa and Deanna Costa appeal from their convictions, after a jury trial, of knowingly making their home available for the manufacturing of a controlled substance for sale or distribution (Health and Saf. Code, § 11366.5, subd. (a)) and David Costa’s conviction of manufacturing amphetamine (Health and Saf. Code, § 11379.6). On appeal, they contend that the prosecution failed to plead and prove that the manufacturing of the controlled substance was for the purpose of sale or distribution and that this is an element of section 11366.5, subdivision (a). They…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. CroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. GlenosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. TrimbleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. Marco A.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.