Omiya v. Castor
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The plaintiff appeals the granting by the Trial Court (Gray, J.) of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court’s action was based on the conclusion that plaintiff’s counter-affidavit, filed in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment, did not comply with RSA 491:8-a in that it did not show “specifically and clearly reasonable grounds for believing that contradictory evidence can be presented at a trial” and, further, did not contain “any contradictory evidence based on [the] personal knowledge” of the plaintiff. RSA 491:8-a, II. We reverse.
On November 5, 1983, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Proctor v. Bank of New Hampshire, N.A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Arsenault v. WillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Community Oil Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- New Hampshire York Co. v. Titus Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Manchenton v. Auto Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Iannelli v. Burger King Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Granite State Management & Resources v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Lake v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Northern New Hampshire Mental Health & Developmental Services, Inc. v. CannellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.