New Hampshire York Co. v. Titus Construction Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
The issue in this case is whether the defendants’ motion for summary judgment should have been granted. “Summary judgment procedure is designed to save time, effort and expense by allowing a final judgment to be entered immediately in those cases where there is no genuine issue of material fact requiring a formal trial.” Nashua Trust Co. v. Sardonis, 101 N. H. 166, 168. We conclude that the Trial Court correcdy denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the defendants’ exceptions are overruled.
Summary judgment (RSA 491:8-a (supp)) is “an excellent device to make possible the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Thomson v. CashSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Concord Group Insurance Companies v. SleeperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Omiya v. CastorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Donnelly v. Kearsarge Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Suojanen v. TardifSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.