Legal Opinion

CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2007No. 04-56809, 04-57129PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA, Circuit Judge.

This case calls on us to decide whether, under California law, a corporation’s allegations that its competitor lured away employees who had signed employment contracts, sufficiently states two common law tort claims and one state statutory claim.

Appellant CRST Van Expedited, Inc. (“CRST”) sued Werner Enterprises, Inc. (“Werner”), claiming Werner had intentionally interfered with CRST’s employment contracts by soliciting and hiring away truck driver employees whom CRST had trained at its expense. CRST additionally claimed Werner violated California Business and Professions…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Gacek v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Angelica Textile Services Inc. v. ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Moore v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Peschel v. City of MissoulaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API