Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Attorney General of State of Tex.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided February 20, 1992No. 13-91-021-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.
Mike M. Perez brings this appeal to challenge the trial court’s allocation of proceeds from a judgment to his obligations under a child support order from a different court. Tony Diaz, Perez’ former attorney, also appeals complaining that the trial court incorrectly failed to allocate proceeds to him based on his contract with Perez. We reform the trial court’s judgment, and as reformed, affirm.
Perez was adjudicated delinquent in child support payments due to his four children in the amount of $16,795.00 in the 36th Judicial District Court in Live Oak County.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Roberson v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Mandell and Wright v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Serna v. Webster, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
- San Juan 1990-A, L.P. v. Meridian Oil Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Risor v. Nebraska BoilerNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Hall v. White, Getgey, Meyer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Augustson v. Linea Aerea Nacional-Chile S.A. (LAN-Chile)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.