Legal Opinion

Madeksho v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols & Friend

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 10, 2001No. 14-98-01462-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL CANNON, Justice (Assigned).

Lawrence Madeksho appeals from a summary judgment in favor of appellees for attorney’s fees due under an oral fee-splitting agreement. In four issues, or points of error, appellant contends: (1) the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for partial summary judgment; (2) the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment; (3) the trial court erred in granting appellees’ summary judgment because they had no right to attorney’s fees under the September 13, 1995 letter agreement; and (4) appellees forfeited their rights to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Hunt Petroleum (AEC), Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Gunn v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Adams v. Downey, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  4. Thomas J. Ellis v. the Renaissance on Turtle Creek Condominium Association, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  5. Freeman Financial Investment Co. v. Toyota Motor Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API