Legal Opinion

Cundiff v. McLean & Miller

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Houston. Tried below before the Hon. Leroy W. Cooper.

1Opinion of the Court

Reeves, Associate Justice.

This suit is brought by William II. Cundiff to recover the amount of a promis*392sory note, given by William McLean and John C. Miller to Sorley, Smith & Co., for $610, and by them transferred to Cundiff, as he alleges in his petition.

Two grounds of defense are relied on to defeat the. action : 1. Failure of consideration. 2. A discharge of the liability by payment of the claim for which the note was given.

In support of these grounds it is contended by counsel for appellees “that the note was given by William McLean, with John C. Miller as his surety, in consideration of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holman v. DowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Beavers v. Goose Creek Consolidated I.S.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
  3. Halbert v. StandleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Ross v. McLellandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Clarence Rakestraw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API