Legal Opinion

Holman v. Dow

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1971No. 7121PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Justice.

This is an action for breach of contract, an accounting and for damages. Trial was before the court, and judgment was rendered that plaintiff take nothing. The parties will be referred to here as they were in the trial court and by the names hereinafter designated.

History and Chronological Development

A brief resume of the background and development of their transaction is essential for this opinion to be understood.

Defendant Roy Woodside (hereinafter called “Woodside”) had been engaged in the oil and gas business for many years. Prior to 1958 Woodside had been negotiating…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Lone Star Gas Co. v. X-Ray Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. First Nat. Bank of Amarillo v. RushTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  5. Fink v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. General Universal Systems, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. The Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp., Etc., and First Gibraltar Bank, Fsb, Intervenor-Appellee v. Jack GriffinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Coastal Plains Development Corp. v. Micrea, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. P & M CATTLE CO. v. HollerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API