Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Estate of Johnson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2002No. 02-267PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Roger Johnson, son of the deceased Earl Johnson, appeals the summary judgment of the Seventh Judicial District Court, Richland County. The District Court found that a holographic document executed by Earl was a list of how Earl wanted certain personal property to be distributed rather than a codicil to his formally executed will. We reverse and remand.

¶2 We address the following issue on appeal:

¶3 Did the District Court err in its application of the Uniform Probate Code, § 72-1-101, et seq., to the holographic document executed by Earl Johnson?

BACKGROUND

¶4 Earl Johnson died testate and was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Motarie v. Northern Montana Joint Refuse Disposal DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Goss v. StaplesMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. In Re Augestad's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In Re Van Voast's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate EhrlichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  2. Hanson v. Estate of BjerkeMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Estate of DamjanovichMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Matter of H.D.K.Montana Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API