Legal Opinion

Goss v. Staples

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1953No. 9230PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE PREEBOURN:

This action comes to us on appeal. The question presented to us is whether or not a letter from the decedent to a stepchild is a holographic will. Two district judges found the letter to be such a will. Under the will the disposition of the property goes to residents of Montana who are stepchildren of the deceased.

The questioned instrument is a letter of seven pages, dated November 29, 1945, signed by the maker, and entirely in her own handwriting. It contained in part the following language: “There is something else I want you, George, and the family to know and that is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roberts v. ColemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. In Re Estate of SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Estate of ButtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Adams v. MarisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  5. Merrill v. BoalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of TeubertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Brandt v. SchuchaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  3. In Re the Estate of KuraltMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re the Estate of KuraltMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re Van Voast's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API