Goss v. Staples
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE PREEBOURN:
This action comes to us on appeal. The question presented to us is whether or not a letter from the decedent to a stepchild is a holographic will. Two district judges found the letter to be such a will. Under the will the disposition of the property goes to residents of Montana who are stepchildren of the deceased.
The questioned instrument is a letter of seven pages, dated November 29, 1945, signed by the maker, and entirely in her own handwriting. It contained in part the following language: “There is something else I want you, George, and the family to know and that is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roberts v. ColemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
- In Re Estate of SpitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Estate of ButtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Adams v. MarisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Merrill v. BoalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re the Estate of TeubertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Brandt v. SchuchaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- In Re the Estate of KuraltMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the Estate of KuraltMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Van Voast's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.