Hanson v. Estate of Bjerke
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Teri Hanson was one of the named beneficiaries in the last will and testament of E. Gilman Bjerke. However, a year after Mr. Bjerke’s will was admitted to probate, certain real property devised to Hanson had not yet been distributed to her. Meanwhile, the personal representative had distributed over $150,000 to the named beneficiary of the residuary estate, Scobey Alumni Foundation, Inc. (SAFI)Hanson filed a declaratory action seeking an interpretation and declaration of her rights pursuant to Mr. Bjerke’s will. Hanson claimed that the eighth paragraph of the will gave her all personal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the Estate of KuraltMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of Estate of WootenMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of Estate of DonovanMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- In the Matter of the Estate of JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stoican v. WagnerMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Schweigert v. SchweigertDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
- Stoican v. WagnerMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Stoican v. WagnerMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Stoican v. WagnerMontana Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.