Legal Opinion

White v. Furgeson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1902No. 4,066PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Jackson Circuit Court; Ralph Applewhite, Special Judge. George H. Furgeson made application for a license to' sell intoxicating liquors to which a remonstrance was filed. The board refused the license and the applicant appealed. From a judgment reversing the order, E. T. White and others, remonstrants, appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

This cause was transferred from the Supreme Court. Appellee applied to the hoard of commissioners of Jackson county for a license to sell intoxicating liquors at retail, under the provisions of the act of 1895, Acts 1895, p. 24:8. Notice of his intention to apply for license was given, and the application was made to the July session, 1900, of said hoard. June 28th and 29th, certain remonstrances against the granting of such license were filed in the auditor’s office. Upon these remonstrances the hoard of commissioners refused the license and dismissed the application. From this action of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Very v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Wright v. EllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  5. Castle v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Booth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Tuten v. BowdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. McClanahan v. BreedingIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Behler v. AckleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Muth v. GoddardMontana Supreme Court · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API