Legal Opinion

Tuten v. Bowden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 16, 1934No. 13887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StabeEr.

On February 15, 1916, R. O. Bowden, one of the defendants in this case, executed in favor of the plaintiff the following promissory note: “On February 15, 1917, after date I promise to pay to the order of Mrs. Harriet Tuten $2, 500.00 Twenty-five Hundred and No/100 Dollars. Value received. Payable at the H. L. & Ex. Bank of Hampton, S. C. To bear interest from date at the rate of eight per cent, per annum. The makers and endorsers hereof, hereby waive demand and protest, and agree to pay all costs of collection, including 10 per…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shellar v. ShiversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Perry v. Acme Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Oyler v. McMurrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. White v. FurgesonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Park v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schlanger v. SimonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. v. City of BettendorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Smith v. Commissioners of Public WorksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Womack v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  5. Parker v. ByrdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API