Legal Opinion

State v. Pask

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 31, 2010No. 2009AP559-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1. This is a child enticement case where the jury found Mitchell D. Pask guilty of attempting to lure a nine-year-old girl to a park shelter area for the purpose of having sexual contact with her. The issue on appeal is the meaning of "secluded place" in Wis. Stat. § 948.07 (2007-08). Pask primarily argues this issue under the guise of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, faulting his trial counsel for not objecting to the meaning given to the jury by the trial court regarding the term "secluded place." At trial, the jury was instructed that "secluded place" means "a place screened…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. JohnstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Hipp v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DouglasColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API