Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Bennett v. Biotronik, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 1, 2017No. 16-15919PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dissent by Judge Siler

OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge:

I

Where an individual has information regarding a fraud perpetrated on the Federal Government, the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., empowers that person—called a “relator”—to bring a suit on the Federal Government’s behalf.1 These are called qui tam2 suits, and have been described as the “primary tool for combatting fraud against the federal government.” U.S. ex rel. Kelly v. Boeing Co., 9 F.3d 743 (9th Cir. 1993).3

But the right to bring qui tam suits is not absolute.

First, there are restrictions to allow the Government to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States of America, Ex Rel. Kevin G. Kelly v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zachary Silbersher v. Allergan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Zachary Silbersher v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Int'lCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. American Bankers Management Co v. Eric HeryfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Stevens-Henager College, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2019
  5. United States Ex Rel. Don Hanks v. Florida Cancer SpecialistsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API