Korein v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Whether the services provided by the landlord after March 15, 1976 conformed to the prior mandate of the Conciliation and Appeals Board was a question of fact, the board’s resolution of which, not being erroneous as a matter of law, is not subject to challenge in the courts (Fresh Meadows Assoc. v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 88 Misc 2d 1003, 1004, affd 55 AD2d 559, affd 42 NY2d 925). Nor is there any basis for judicial disturbance of the penalty imposed (Matter of Pell v Board of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fresh Meadows Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Fresh Meadows Associates v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Plaza Realty Investors v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Ansonia Residents' Ass'n v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988