Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Auslaender

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 3, 1971No. 532, September Term, 1970PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

We are faced with the problem so often presented to courts of equity in domestic matters — what to do with minor children of a broken marriage. Difficult at best to come to a solution that seems satisfyingly wise and sound, the problem before us is intensified. The chancellor found each parent fit to be awarded custody 1 as “educated, intelligent people”, concerned with the welfare of their son and daughter. He resolved the predicament by placing the care of the children in one and then the other. They are to spend three years in the custody of the father and the following three years in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ross v. PickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  2. Dietrich v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Burns v. BinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Cullotta v. CullottaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Radford v. MatczukCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Montgomery County Department of Social Services v. SandersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Kramer v. KramerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API