Legal Opinion
Manning v. Embert
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 23, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Heuisler, J.) The facts are stated in. the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The appellant, Cleveland P. Manning, is the owner of a leasehold property in the City of Baltimore, known as No. 907 West North avenue. He and the appellee entered into a contract under seal for the sale and purchase of this property. The contract is here transcribed:
“This Agreement, made this 27th day of February, nineteen hundred and fourteen, between Cleveland P. Manning, of the City of Baltimore and State of Maryland, party of the first part, and T. Howard Embert, Attorney and Agent, of the City of Baltimore and State of Maryland, party of the second part:
“Witnesseth, that the said party…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Lutz v. LinthicumSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Stobie v. DillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Stewart v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Carroll v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Vail v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952