Legal Opinion

Vail v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 7, 1952No. [No. 110, October Term, 1951.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal from judgments rendered in favor of the defendants, appellees, as the result of sustaining demurrers to appellant’s third amended declaration, without leave to amend.

The declaration alleges in its first count that William F. Walker, Jr. (Walker), and/or Rowe Manufacturing Company, (Rowe), appellees, some time in March, 1949, and prior to the happening of the wrongs hereafter complained of, “did install certain overhead type doors at a building at 230 North Franklintown Road, Baltimore, Maryland;” said doors being installed by the said Walker and/or Rowe, under and by virtue…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Le Vonas v. Acme Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Maenner v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. State v. Benjamin F. Bennett Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. Marlboro Shirt Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  5. Steinwedel v. HilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. S. Abell Co. v. SkeenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Cutlip v. Lucky Stores, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Walker v. VailCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API