Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1920No. 2346PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bernalillo County; H. F. Raynolds, Judge. Action by State of. New Mexico against W. L. Johnson. Judgment for defendant on demurrer to complaint, and the State appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

MECHEM,

District Judge. The state of New Mexico brings this action to enjoin one W. L. Johnson from the practice of osteopathy and medicine without having a license. The complaint is in two counts. By the first it is charged that W. L. Johnson, was engaged in practicing osteopathy in the county of Bernalillo without having first obtained a license as required by law, and that such practice constitutes a nuisance, and is dangerous, detrimental, and injurious to the health of the inhabitants of the county of Bernalillo and state of New Mexico. The second count is the same as…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. SeccombeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Marron v. CompereNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People Ex Rel. Chiropractic League v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Takiguchi v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API