Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Woods

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 2007PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J.:

¶ 1 This case is a direct appeal from judgment of sentence. Appellant’s issue is whether the trial court erred in denying his post-sentence motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea. Appellant’s counsel has filed a petition to withdraw and a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), alleging that the appeal is wholly frivolous. We deny counsel’s petition without prejudice and we remand for the filing of a proper Anders petition and brief or an advocate’s brief.

Facts

¶ 2 Appellant was charged with possession of a controlled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. GoodwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. NischanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FlowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. HankersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Com. v. Alameda, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Anderson, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Anushiem, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API