Legal Opinion
MacConnell v. Mitten
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1981No. 15346PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
Plaintiff, Forrest MacConnell, brought an action against defendants Frederick G. Mitten, Eileen Mitten, and other persons who are not part of this appeal, regarding allegedly defamatory statements that were made by Fred Mitten at the time of plaintiff’s termination by his employer, the Bureau of Medical Economics. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment which was granted with directions that the judgment be entered pursuant to Rule 54(b), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. Plaintiff appeals the granting of the motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Antwerp Diamond Exchange of America, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Maricopa County, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Portonova v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Sewell v. BrookbankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Modla v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Unelko Corp., an Illinois Corporation Howard G. Ohlhausen v. Andy Rooney, an Individual Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Dunlap v. WayneWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Yetman v. EnglishArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Glaze v. MarcusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Garson v. HendlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.