Legal Opinion

Glaze v. Marcus

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 6, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5785PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

James R. and Dolores B. Glaze, husband and wife, appeal from an adverse summary judgment entered in favor of Paul Marcus. They argue that there are disputed issues of fact which prevent summary disposition of their claim for defamation. In granting summary judgment the trial court found that any claim arising from the alleged defamation contained in a letter dated November 8, 1983, was barred by the statute of limitations and that testimony given by Marcus at a grievance hearing requested by Glaze was opinion based on disclosed facts admitted by Glaze as true. Marcus…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Royer v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Cross v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. MacConnell v. MittenArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Costa v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Ness v. Western Security Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Turner v. DevlinArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wallace v. Casa Grande Union High School District No. 82Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API